Proposal to rearrange project folders
What are your thoughts on rearranging the default folders like the following?
Conceptually, this is proposing to put all the 'settings' within their own folder. That way, if using something like git submodules, you can sync in common standards across multiple projects.
...
Titleblocks are usually project specific, so I did not put them in the settings
folder.
...
Below, also proposes to put additional underlay
subfolders to organize things a little more.
* settings
* drawings
* default.css
* markers.svg
* patterns.svg
* shading_styles.json
* symbols.svg
* layouts
* view-title.svg
* psets
* foo_property_set_template.ifc
* drawings
* foo.svg
* bar.svg
* underlay
* foo-underlay.png
* bar-underlay.png
* cache
* foo-linework.svg
* bar-linework.svg
* foo-annotation.svg
* bar-annotation.svg
* foo-underlay.png
* bar-underlay.png
* layouts
* sheet_1.svg
* sheet_2.svg
* titleblocks
* A1.svg
* sheets
* sheet_1.svg
* sheet_2.svg
* underlay
* sheet_1-underlay.png
* sheet_2-underlay.png
Comments
Thoughts:
How can all this be integrated into the ISO 19650 (information management) especially within the standard folders (i.e. ARCHIVE, WIP, SHARED and PUBLISHED folders). I believe one of the things that makes BBIM attractive is the freedom to information management and its compliance to ISO standards.